What it means to know something is true and distinguishing between what you know do not know or can

February A few days ago I finally figured out something I've wondered about for 25 years:

What it means to know something is true and distinguishing between what you know do not know or can

Overview[ edit ] This section is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style.

These arguments fail to appreciate that the limits of one's understanding or certainty do not change what is true. They do not inform upon reality. That is, whatever the reality is, it does not "wait" upon human logic or analysis to be formulated. Reality exists at all times, and it exists independently of what is in the mind of anyone.

And the true thrust of science and rational analysis is to separate preconceived notion s of what reality is, and to be open at all times to the observation of nature as it behaves, so as truly to discover reality.

This fallacy can be very convincing and is considered by some to be a special case of a false dilemma or false dichotomy in that they both fail to consider alternatives.

What it means to know something is true and distinguishing between what you know do not know or can

A false dilemma may take the form: If a proposition has not been disproved, then it cannot be considered false and must therefore be considered true. If a proposition has not been proven, then it cannot be considered true and must therefore be considered false.

Such arguments attempt to exploit the facts that a true things can never be disproved and b false things can never be proved. In other words, appeals to ignorance claim that the converse of these facts are also true. Therein lies the fallacy. Schreuder, Vision and Visual Perception To reiterate, these arguments ignore the fact, and difficulty, that some true things may never be proved, and some false things may never be disproved with absolute certainty.

The phrase "the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence " can be used as a shorthand rebuttal to the second form of the ignorance fallacy i. P has never been absolutely proved and is therefore certainly false. Most often it is directed at any conclusion derived from null results in an experiment or from the non-detection of something.

Literary Terms and Definitions O

In other words, where one researcher may say their experiment suggests evidence of absence, another researcher might argue that the experiment failed to detect a phenomenon for other reasons. Matters of confusion[ edit ] See also: Evidence of absence Much confusion about arguments from ignorance can be caused when one side of a debate forgets that we often possess evidence of absence in practice.

However, the confusion can be avoided by not partaking in a logical debate. The ignorance fallacy is sometimes confused or combined with logically valid contrapositive arguments. Contrapositive arguments rightly utilize the transposition rule of inference in classical logic to conclude something like: In other words, if a cause always leads to an effect, then absence of the expected effect is evidence of absence of the cause.

For example, if the causal proposition that If it's raining outside then the streets will be wet is assumed, then it can be assumed that if the streets are not wet then it is not raining outside.It has been suggested that we do not, or cannot, know anything, or at least that we do not know as much as we think we do.

Such a view is called skepticism.

What it means to know something is true and distinguishing between what you know do not know or can

We can distinguish between a number of different varieties of skepticism. Feb 12,  · Getting to know the difference between fear and intuition takes practice and it is absolutely worth the effort.

On a side note: Fearful feelings can be interfering, but they are not . Similarly, as far as I know means to the extent that my knowledge reaches—that is, “I do not claim to know everything about this topic, but what I do know is this ” See here how "I do know" is used to imply that you do not know everything about the topic, but you something, and that something is.

Artistic Grade Versus Architectural Grade: Soapstone is quarried in two basic types: high talc (artistic) and low talc (architectural). If you’ve heard that soapstone is too soft for countertops, that myth comes from not distinguishing between the two types.

THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK Inspirational thoughts, motivational quotes, and wisdom from around the world A new thought each and every week.

Underlying these thoughts are my personal values and my personal philosophy which encompass difference and diversity, fun and friendship, optimism and openness, trust, tolerance and teamwork, creativity, learning and growth, a commitment to reason and .

Jan 02,  · In regard to Peter B.’s comment about overstating the study with the comment on the Joy of owning a Stradivarius – I don’t think that was a comment on the study but an observation regarding.

Knowledge How (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)